[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript.
From: |
Bruno Hertz |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript. |
Date: |
17 May 2004 00:18:26 +0200 |
On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 22:19, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>
> This is maybe offtopic ... but the problem doesn't seem to be entirely your
> fault. IMHO, either Redhat shouldn't make UTF-8 the default, or your vi
> clone is buggy. People do not expect their text files to *by default*
> contain anything other than one-octet-per-character text[0].
>
> BR,
> /Jörgen
>
Yeah, maybe. The UTF-8 default caused users trouble in various contexts,
which I learned during my hours of web searching today :)
The vi clone on the other hand is more of a port of the original BSD vi
and rather good as such, though not multibyte capable. But I essentially
knew this, since it's mentioned on the author's web site.
No, I must say I wasn't on top of things. Still, I now understood
something about i18n, and it's actually a pretty interesting subject.
That's the neat thing about Unix & friends - every single day there's
something new to learn :)
Thanks, Bruno.
- [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Bruno Hertz, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Bruno Hertz, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Bruno Hertz, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Jorgen Grahn, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript.,
Bruno Hertz <=
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Roger Leigh, 2004/05/16
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Bruno Hertz, 2004/05/17
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., Jorgen Grahn, 2004/05/17
- Re: [Groff] German Umlaute, ISO-8859-1, postscript., MJ Ray, 2004/05/17