[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Introduction
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Introduction |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:05:41 +0200 (CEST) |
> Please do so! For testing and educational purposes, the web site
> is directly created by groff from `webpage.ms' (and `groff.css').
>
> I wonder if this is on the ffii site, not gnu.org. Is the gnu.org
> page (at /software/groff) a mirror of the ffii site?
For simplicity, they are the same.
> If so, is seperate access needed?
What exactly do you mean? My working cycle is
. Wait until a new release is ready.
. Go through the ChangeLog file and update the NEWS file where
necessary.
. Copy the new stuff from NEWS to webpage.ms and adjust it to be
valid groff code.
. Say `make' to generate `webpage.html'.
. Copy `webpage.html' to gnu.org, manually adjust the links to the
two images, then replace the old with the new version by renaming
it to `groff.html'.
. Copy `groff.html' to ffii.org.
Of course this could be automated somehow, but I was too lazy to do
that.
> However, I think a better idea would be to do it through the
> configure script. Did I overlook an option already present?
What shall the *groff* configure script do? Shouldn't this be rather
something in the *man* configure script?
> Only a non-asked question is a dumb question.
>
> Well, this is debatable. Where documentation is already present,
> asking without reading could be considered dumb. Then again, we all
> overlook things in our readings, and it doesn't take too long to
> refer others back to the manual.
It *very* often happens that in spite of zillions of documents, you
don't find the right one. Asking is always fine, even if you get a
reply such as `Please read this and that'. Insisting then without
reading: This is dumb, and in such cases you normally get a harsh
answer, and right so.
Werner