Werner Lemberg wrote, quoting Larry McVoy:
And as the primary whiner on this topic, I'll volunteer to do the
work to convert the existing texinfo docs to roff.
This is a great offer, but I wonder whether it makes sense to use
the time you are willing to invest in a better way.
. I won't give up on groff.texinfo. This consequently means that we
need a groff2texinfo converter (or groff2info to get the more
important info files) in case the source files are in groff
format. Personally, I *really* like the indexing features of
`info' which are quite powerful. I'm not aware of a different
indexing system which is freely available (but I must admit that I
haven't done an extensive search).
Writing such a script/program might be easy, but it probably
doubles the amount of time needed for a proper conversion.
It isn't difficult to conceive a groff macro package, which, when used
with `groff -Tascii -mroff2txi` for example, would spit out texinfo
source.
Indeed, before I embarked on the development of pdfmark.tmac, I did
create a rudimentary implementation, mimicking a subset of the ms
macros, which would do just that. As proof of concept, it worked, but
the eventual output from texinfo, formatted as either PDF or HTML, was
of such disappointing quality, that I abandoned the idea.