[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:53:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
> Nested lists work well in MM most of the time, but I
> have just found a situation wherein MM seems to have
> a problem:
[snip]
BVL's list type is "-1". When LE restores the outer list's
settings via address@hidden and address@hidden, the list type is reset as
.nr \\$2 \\*[misc*pop]
where \\$2 ist the register name (in this case, "li*type") and
\\*[misc*pop] is the saved type (in this case, "-1"). But this
gets interpreted as an increment, not as the number itself.
You can fix it by changing the above line in address@hidden to
.nr \\$2 0\\*[misc*pop]
- [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Anton Shepelev, 2010/06/23
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL,
Tadziu Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/06/24
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Anton Shepelev, 2010/06/24
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/06/24
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Ted Harding, 2010/06/24
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2010/06/27
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Ted Harding, 2010/06/27
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Anton Shepelev, 2010/06/27
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Ted Harding, 2010/06/27
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Anton Shepelev, 2010/06/28
- Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL, Ted Harding, 2010/06/29