[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL
From: |
Bernd Warken |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:25:24 +0100 (CET) |
> Von: "Werner LEMBERG" <address@hidden>
>
> > So which license should we prefer for documentation files:
> > - make all documentation files into GPL
> > - make all documentation files into FDL
> > - keep the licenses of all files as they are
>
> Since I currently don't want to invest much time into groff, I vote
> for no change, of course.
Don't panic. I will do that. But we should be clear wether we use
FDL or not. First it is possible to change the man-pages that belong
to the FSF. All of them should have the same license.
Other strange licenses will come later on.
> > In any case, the file LICENSES has to be updated accordingly.
>
> Patches are welcomed :-)
First we should be clear about what has to be changed. When we use
FDL, that should be documented in the LICENSES file.
Bernd Warken
- [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/24
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/24
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL,
Bernd Warken <=
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/24
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Colin Watson, 2013/01/24
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, walter harms, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Colin Watson, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Daode, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Daode, 2013/01/26