[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] space width
From: |
Dave Kemper |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] space width |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:40:18 -0600 |
On 2/1/14, Walter Alejandro Iglesias <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014, Werner Lemberg wrote:
>>> Given today's memory abundance and the high velocity of CPUs, the
>>> ideal route would be to implement a document-wide algorithm for
>>> typesetting a document (in contrast to TeX's page-wide approach).
>
> You want more features because you have more memory, and you want more
> memory because you want more features.
My system has scandalously little physical memory for a machine in 2014,
but I would still love to have a document-wide formatting algorithm
available in groff. As long as groff provided the choice to optimize
for either minimizing resource usage or maximizing quality of output,
I could run in the former mode during development and then have the
final document prepared in the latter mode overnight.
In other words, I want this feature because I covet higher quality output,
not because I have all this memory lying around I don't know what else
to do with.
- Re: [Groff] space width, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/01
- Re: [Groff] space width,
Dave Kemper <=
- Re: [Groff] space width, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/02/01
- Re: [Groff] space width, hohe72, 2014/02/01
- Re: [Groff] space width, Peter Schaffter, 2014/02/02
- Re: [Groff] space width, Dave Kemper, 2014/02/04
- Re: [Groff] space width, Peter Schaffter, 2014/02/04
- Re: [Groff] space width, Mike Bianchi, 2014/02/04
- Re: [Groff] space width, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/04
- Re: [Groff] space width, Peter Schaffter, 2014/02/04
- [Groff] Future direction of groff, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/02/04
- Re: [Groff] Future direction of groff, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/04