[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] space width
From: |
James K. Lowden |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] space width |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:31:06 -0500 |
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:15:28 -0700
Dave Kemper <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/18/13, Tadziu Hoffmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > In the original troff (according to the Troff User's Manual)
> > a space was nominally 1/3 em and a thinspace was 1/6 em,
> > thus half a normal space. In groff's TR font, a space
> > is nominally 1/4 em, but a thinspace is still only 1/6 em.
> > Isn't that strange?
>
> I thought of this two-month-old post when I found
> http://www.heracliteanriver.com/?p=324, a lengthy article that
> exhaustively documents that until the early to mid 20th century,
> standard typesetting practice was to put more space between sentences
> than between words.
http://xkcd.com/1285/
Published 2013-11-01, in eerie anticipation of Tadziu's post.
--jkl
- Re: [Groff] Future direction of groff, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Future direction of groff, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Future direction of groff, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/02/08
- Re: [Groff] Future direction of groff, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/05
- Re: [Groff] space width, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/04
- Re: [Groff] space width, Pierre-Jean, 2014/02/06
- Re: [Groff] space width, hohe72, 2014/02/06
- Re: [Groff] space width, hohe72, 2014/02/06
Re: [Groff] space width,
James K. Lowden <=