Re: [Groff] [groff]: New groff preprocessor for Perl parts in groff files.

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Bernd,

> Ingo wrote:
> > I suspect this reordering might be a bad idea.  I realize you are
> > trying to make this nicer by ordering it alphabetically, but i don't
> > think the order is arbitrary.  I certainly remember dependency and
> > ordering issues when porting groff in the past.
>  
> Ordering is 'logical' ("Spock").

As is topological ordering by dependency if that's what's need to make
it work consistently.  :-)

Cheers, Ralph.