[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Letterspacing
From: |
Peter Schaffter |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Letterspacing |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:23:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014, Werner Lemberg wrote:
> Well, as Tadziu's example shows, if you simply allow some squeezing of
> the *inter-word* distances, you can get very nice results. If this
> isn't good enough, some *minimum* letterspacing might be applied, as
> done by pdftex.
>
> Not doing the former but only doing the latter is not good enough
> IMHO.
We're in agreement.
> > This kind of line-by-line letterspacing has been pretty much
> > stock-in-trade since the earliest days of standalone
> > phototypesetting systems, which is why I'm puzzled.
>
> My main concern is the improvement of *automatic* typesetting.
Mine, too. :)
I think what we all want from groff is a better approach to
automatic formatting for general purpose, the-client-doesn't-want-
to-pay-a-fortune typesetting. Concurrently, we don't want to fight
with the program when fine typography is called for.
--
Peter Schaffter
http://www.schaffter.ca
Re: [Groff] Letterspacing, Steve Izma, 2014/03/27
Re: [Groff] Letterspacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/03/27
- Re: [Groff] Letterspacing,
Peter Schaffter <=
Re: [Groff] Letterspacing, Doug McIlroy, 2014/03/26