[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug)
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug) |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:54:44 +0000 |
Hi Steffen,
> (For the list: mawk(1) requires a fflush("") in order to "getline <
> NAME" a file NAME that has been written via "print >> NAME" before,
> even though fflush("") is not standard and i cannot imagine a
> situation where an awk(1) script would not like to see a fflush("") on
> NAME before it starts a getline.)
Can you not close() NAME after writing to it before re-opening it for
getline? From mawk(1):
Close is used to reread a file or command,
Cheers, Ralph.
- [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Werner LEMBERG, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Ingo Schwarze, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/10
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Ingo Schwarze, 2014/11/10
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/11
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug),
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/11
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/11
Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/10