[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex
From: |
Clarke Echols |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:09:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
On 11/12/2014 02:51 PM, Carsten Kunze wrote:
Hello,
the mdoc macros display for
.Ex -std uuencode uudecode b64encode b64decode
EXIT STATUS
The uuencode, uudecode, b64encode, and b64decode utilities [...]
I think the "," before "and" is not intended.
Carsten
The comma before 'and' is acceptable English punctuation. In fact,
there are situations where omitting the comma can make a sentence
confusing because it can introduce ambiguity for the reader.
In your example, omitting the comma does not create a problem, but
I've seen white papers and other documents where the writer seems
obsessed about "minimizing" the use of commas, resulting in a
very confusing, difficult-to-read and parse correctly, block of
text, leading the reader to discard the document completely or
question the competence of the company or people responsible for
it.
Clarke
- [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex, Carsten Kunze, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex,
Clarke Echols <=
- Re: [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex, Jones, Larry, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Groff] mdoc: Additional "," from .Ex, Keith Marshall, 2014/11/12