[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:36:53 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
On 13/02/19 21:00, Doug McIlroy wrote:
> I run groff on windows a lot, but via cygwin, which emulates
> Unix. I am inclined to think that if you like the groff toolset,
> you are likely to want other Unix capability, too, and thus
> gravitate towards facilities like cygwin.
>
> I take it that Keith uses groff on bare Windows without a
> Unix veneer.
I used to; I no longer use Windows for anything much. In the days when
I did use it, I always found cygwin to deliver a rather unsatisfactory
experience.
> If many people work in that mode, we should not abandon them.
I fully agree. Native Windows support is already built in; it is based
on stable APIs, and is robust. It would be folly, to just rip it out.
--
Keith
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, (continued)
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Eric S. Raymond, 2019/02/12
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/02/13
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Colin Watson, 2019/02/14
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, John Gardner, 2019/02/14
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Walter Harms, 2019/02/14
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/02/14
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Colin Watson, 2019/02/14
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, John Gardner, 2019/02/14
- Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/02/15
[groff] Loss of MSVC support, Doug McIlroy, 2019/02/13
[groff] Loss of MSVC support, Doug McIlroy, 2019/02/13
Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Doug McIlroy, 2019/02/13
Re: [groff] Loss of MSVC support, Doug McIlroy, 2019/02/13