Re: (off topic?) Docbook? Re: manlint?

[Keith Marshall]

On 29/09/2020 16:27, James K. Lowden wrote:
> That would work, but IMO wouldn't be very convenient.  I was thinking
> along the lines of 
> 
> .SH id=foo class=bar
> Your title here

That would conflict with groff's existing SH usage; from groff_ms(7):
>  .SH [xx]
>         Unnumbered subheading.  The use of the optional xx argument is
>         a GNU extension, which adjusts the point size of the unnumbered
>         subheading to match that of a numbered heading, introduced
>         using .NH xx with the same value of xx.

-- 
Regards,
Keith.