[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:43:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) |
> element of set is '\[mo]'. Would it still be logical to expand
> the synax for eqn to add it as a keyword?
I would just put something like
define member % type relation \[mo] %
define emptyset % \[es] %
and so on into my own eqnrc file, then you can say
.EQ
x member emptyset
.EN
and so on.
(Set GROFF_TMAC_PATH to the name of the directory that contains
the eqnrc, so that it will be found automatically.)
- GNU eqn question/suggestion, Olle Lögdahl, 2020/11/13
- Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion, Olle Lögdahl, 2020/11/13
- Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion, Damian McGuckin, 2020/11/13
- Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/11/13
- Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion,
Tadziu Hoffmann <=
- includes in eqn & pic. [Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion], Holger Herrlich, 2020/11/27
- Re: includes in eqn & pic. [Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion], Tadziu Hoffmann, 2020/11/27
- Re: includes in eqn & pic. [Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion], Holger Herrlich, 2020/11/27
- Re: includes in eqn & pic. [Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion], Tadziu Hoffmann, 2020/11/27
- Re: includes in eqn & pic. [Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion], Holger Herrlich, 2020/11/28