[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stpecpy(): A better string copy function
|
From: |
Larry McVoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: stpecpy(): A better string copy function |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 Feb 2022 19:02:06 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:28:02PM -0500, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> (As a matter of programming style, I prefer to use 0 to specify a null
> pointer; it doesn't require one to haul in stddef.h as NULL does. And
> it doesn't shout.)
Amen.
- Fwd: stpecpy(): A better string copy function, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages), 2022/02/13
- Fwd: Re: stpecpy(): A better string copy function, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages), 2022/02/13
- Re: Fwd: Re: stpecpy(): A better string copy function, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages), 2022/02/13
- Re: Fwd: Re: stpecpy(): A better string copy function, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages), 2022/02/13
- memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x (was: stpecpy(): A better string copy function), Alejandro Colomar (man-pages), 2022/02/13
- Re: memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x (was: stpecpy(): A better string copy function), Martin Sebor, 2022/02/14
- Re: memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x (was: stpecpy(): A better string copy function), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2022/02/14
- Re: stpecpy(): A better string copy function (was: memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x), Alejandro Colomar (man-pages), 2022/02/14