[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Five glyphs: a minor PostScript challenge
From: |
John Gardner |
Subject: |
Re: Five glyphs: a minor PostScript challenge |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:56:53 +1100 |
>
> Does anyone have enough PostScript wizardry to achieve any of this?
I do. I'm quite <https://github.com/Alhadis/Stupid-Post-Tricks> fluent
<https://github.com/Alhadis/Inspect.ps> in PostScript programming, and your
suspicions about the dynamic glyph generation are correct.
I'll have a more serious look into this tomorrow when I'm not about to
collapse under my insomnia.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 23:29, Damian McGuckin <damianm@esi.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > A. \[-+]: The minus-plus. We should be able to dynamically generate
> > this from \[+-] by reflecting the latter about a horizontal axis. If
> > the glyph is flipped within its bounding box, I guess the result
> > would need to be vertically shifted to align it on the baseline.
>
> This needs a lot of work but might get you started.
>
> \s+1\fB+\h'-0.55m'\v'-0.30v'\-\v'+0.30v'\fP\s-1
>
> > Does anyone have enough PostScript wizardry to achieve any of this?
>
> What I had has long disappeared from my brain. It is 20 years ago.
>
> Stay safe - Damian
>
> Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
> Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted
> here
> Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present
> employer
>
>