Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] problem with "Enhanced" bug queries in Savannah

[Ineiev]

Hi, Branden;

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 02:27:59PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
...
> I would suggest that these date-sorting fields in particular could be
> handled as further "Additional constraint(s)" as the UI already
> supports.

I've added another date operator, '*', to the existing '>', '=', '<',
and made it default; let us hope the users will understand that
it means 'any, even undefined.'

> > > 7. Erasing the operator from the chunk of the HTTP GET query doesn't
> > >    work, possibly because there's no empty or null option for the date
> > >    ordering operator.  It defaults to the first item in the list, which
> > >    is "<".  (This appears to be true for both "date_op" and
> > >    "close_date_op".)  You have to remove these chunks entirely.
> > 
> > I don't understand how these are possible.
...
> I simply
> hand-deleted various "&foo=bar" fields until I was left with a query
> that returned the results I sought.

Now I see, thanks.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature