[CC += groff@, since it was CCd in the old conversation referred to here]
Hi Ingo,
On 7/27/22 17:32, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Alejandro Colomar wrote on Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 06:17:40PM +0200:
>> I wondered for a long time what happens if you create subdirs within a
>> man? section. How do man(1)s handle
</usr/share/man/man3/python/foo.3>?
> On *BSD systems, that typically means:
>
> The architecture-specific library function foo(3)
> for the "python" hardware architecture.
>
> Here are a few examples from OpenBSD:
>
> /usr/share/man/man1/sparc64/mksuncd.1
> /usr/share/man/man2/armv7/arm_sync_icache.2
> /usr/share/man/man2/i386/i386_iopl.2
> /usr/share/man/man3/octeon/cacheflush.3
> /usr/share/man/man3/sgi/get_fpc_csr.3
> /usr/share/man/man4/alpha/irongate.4
> /usr/share/man/man4/amd64/mpbios.4
> /usr/share/man/man4/luna88k/cbus.4
> /usr/share/man/man4/macppc/openpic.4
> /usr/share/man/man4/powerpc64/opalcons.4
> /usr/share/man/man4/riscv64/sfgpio.4
> /usr/share/man/man5/sparc64/ldom.conf.5
> /usr/share/man/man8/hppa/boot.8
> /usr/share/man/man8/macppc/pdisk.8
> /usr/share/man/man8/sgi/sgivol.8
> /usr/share/man/man8/sparc64/ldomctl.8
On 10/17/22 03:22, наб wrote:
Cf., well, the UNIX Programmer's Manual:
https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Distributions/Research/Dennis_v1/UNIX_ProgrammersManual_Nov71.pdf
PDF page 191; yes, the typographical convention here is insane, and
the contemprary-correct way to refer to this page from within the manual
would be /just/ "/etc/ascii", but, given the context, "/etc/ascii (VII)"
makes the most sense to me
I just saw this and wondered if the subdirs in the past were used as
just part of the manual page name...
I have been remembering every now and then the discussion we had about a
hypothetical -M, and think we need it or something like that. I guess
subdirs are not possible nowadays because of the translation usage, but