|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: [tz] Doubts about a typo fix |
Date: | Fri, 25 Nov 2022 19:50:14 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 2022-11-25 19:20, Russ Allbery wrote:
You have to be very careful with the combination of \f(CW and \fP on Solaris 10 nroff
That should be OK, as \f(CW - which is now \f(CR - is used only if \n(.g is nonzero, i.e., only if it's groff and not traditional troff.
I toyed with using \f[CW] instead of \f(CW to underscore that it's groff-specific. However, that might be overkill given the number of non-*roff programs that read these files.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |