[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words)
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words) |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:15:00 -0500 |
[self-follow-up]
Yet another of my self-clarifications/corrections...
At 2023-05-31T22:18:04-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At any rate, "chartype" seems to be just syntactic sugar for iterated
> "type" commands, as follows.
>
> chartype "CLASS" abc
>
> becomes
>
> type "CLASS" "a"
> type "CLASS" "b"
> type "CLASS" "c"
>
> where a, b, c, are ordinary or special groff characters.
The foregoing isn't _quite_ syntactic sugar. In GNU eqn, a `type`
assignment applies only to the subsequent expression; `chartype`
assignments are persistent for the rest of the life of the eqn process,
until overridden.
I got this right in my updates to the eqn(1) page but managed to goof it
here on the list.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), (continued)
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/09
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/09
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/09
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Richard Morse, 2023/06/09
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/09
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/09
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/10
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/12
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/12
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/16
Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words),
G. Branden Robinson <=