[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: First impressions: strange groff default font behaviour after system
From: |
Deri |
Subject: |
Re: First impressions: strange groff default font behaviour after system upgrade |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:47:59 +0000 |
On Monday, 18 December 2023 21:07:16 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > My first question: Is this new behaviour intended?
>
> Probably not. Oddly, not much earlier today, we got a similar report
> from T. Kurt Bond about the URW fonts being troublesome--as in, not
> found--in a groff build from source on Fedora 39.
>
> So something would appear to be amiss. I'm hoping Deri can help us
> figure it out.
Hi Branden,
Happy to. The two issues are probably not linked, one is a problem with the
configure script not finding the URW font directory, and the other is a non-
visible glyph from the symbol font.
Cheers
Deri
Re: First impressions: strange groff default font behaviour after system upgrade, Deri, 2023/12/18