Re: [PATCH] nextup.3: minor improvements

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2024-08-09 15:53:30 +1000, John Gardner wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> > So ideally, the fallback for "±0" should be "+0 or -0", which is
> > much more readable and less ambiguous than "+-0" or "+/-0".
> 
> For approximating ± in ASCII, is there some reason \z_+0 hasn't been
> considered?

I don't like that at all. I really see a "+" underlined, so it is
confusing. Moreover, the information is not kept by copy-paste,
and it is not rendered as wanted with "xterm +ulc" (to replace
underline by color). And I don't think that it will correctly be
interpreted by screen readers.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)