[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support)
From: |
Marco Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 06:56:10 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sunday 17 October 2004 22:48, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Do you remember how much is gained by doing this?
>
> I don't remember well, but my paper in Japanese says that it was about
> 2KB. Since the kernel has grown a bit more since that time, I guess the
> gain could be about 3KB in the current implementation. -mregparm=3 has
> a significant effect on functions with a few arguments.
Nice. Is there more interesting information like this in the Japanese
paper you wrote? I know this is a really vague question. :/
Thanks,
Marco
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), (continued)
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/10/15
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Marco Gerards, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Marco Gerards, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Marco Gerards, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/10/17
- Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support),
Marco Gerards <=
Re: iso9660 support, Marco Gerards, 2004/10/15