[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linux headers
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: linux headers |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:24:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:59:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> How is it that util/biosdisk.c makes effort to avoid including Linux headers
> and defines Linux ioctl macros on its own?
>
> This adds an extra maintainance burden, so I guess there must be a reason to
> do
> it, but can't think of one..
Ah, and also I'm not really sure that ioctl definitions are always architecture
independant.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is address@hidden Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.