[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /kern/file.c BUG
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: /kern/file.c BUG |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:19:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:34, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:08 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> > Previous behavior was working correctly. You have to handle
> > errorcodes
> > at some point and that means when error is handled it is zeroed (or
> > GRUB_ERR_NONE). So code is in callee where that loop was.
>
> I suggest that we never set grub_errno to 0 (except the initialization).
> That would match the standard errno behavior:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/errno.html
Marco is right. As you pointed out, our error handling is different from errno
on Unix, but this is intentional, because I stole the model from GRUB Legacy
and Parted.
Okuji
- /kern/file.c BUG, Oleg Strikov, 2008/01/23
- Re: /kern/file.c BUG, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/25
- Re: /kern/file.c BUG, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/25
- Re: /kern/file.c BUG, Robert Millan, 2008/01/25
- Re: /kern/file.c BUG, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/26
- Re: /kern/file.c BUG, Robert Millan, 2008/01/26