[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:03:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Friday 08 February 2008 17:18, Robert Millan wrote:
> Fixes an ugly result of setting timeout=0.
>
> When this is combined with the "sleep" patch I just sent, user can
> implement hiddenmenu-like functionality via scripting:
>
> echo -n "Press `ESC' to enter the menu... "
> if sleep -v -i 10 ; then
> set timeout=10
> else
> set timeout=0
> fi
I think this is a bit strange. I don't think anybody expects that "sleep"
outputs a counter or is interrupted by a key input. It is too different from
POSIX's sleep.
My preference is rather to extend "read". Bash's "read" accepts a timeout and
some other options.
Okuji
- [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Robert Millan, 2008/02/08
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Robert Millan, 2008/02/09
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Robert Millan, 2008/02/09
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/02/10
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Robert Millan, 2008/02/10
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/02/10
- Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Isaac Dupree, 2008/02/10
Re: [PATCH] if timeout is set to zero, don't bother drawing the menu, Robert Millan, 2008/02/28