[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boot.img Fix
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: boot.img Fix |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:34:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:30:01AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Robert Millan <address@hidden>:
>
>> I agree GRUB should be very careful not to destroy potentially valuable
>> data. However, that's not to say FAT install is important. Typically
>> our install doesn't collide or interfere with any filesystem, it's only
>> a few corner cases that do, and IMO we should try to discourage those.
>>
>> But of course, destroying someone's filesystem is not the right way to
>> discourage something :-)
>
> I think installing to the first (or any) sector of a filesystem not
> known specifically to allow that should at least require --force.
Agreed.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."