[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX
From: |
Andrey Borzenkov |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 23:11:43 +0400 |
В Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:58:36 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" <address@hidden> пишет:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:56:52PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > You don't need an EFI system to give GRUB enough space. You just
> > need to partition the drive so the first partition starts at 1MB
> > instead of sector 63. I think using a GPT partition scheme is quite
> > preferred over the MSDOS scheme designed 30 years ago.
>
> That's true. Does grub-install check the partition table to see how much
> room there is before placing itself after the MBR?
Yes. It even checks whether it has other known software that installs
something in post-MBR gap and can install itself in free space
(assuming it is enough).
- GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Martin Wilck, 2013/02/07
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/09
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Martin Wilck, 2013/02/18
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/18
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Michael Chang, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Martin Wilck, 2013/02/19