[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Command documentation part 1.
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: |
Re: Command documentation part 1. |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:11:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 |
On 30.03.2013 09:46, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:48:37 +0100
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden> пишет:
>
>>> address@hidden Command background_color color
>>> +Set background color for active terminal. For valid color specifications
>>> see
>>> address@hidden file format, ,Colors}. Background color can be changed only
>>> when
>>> +using @samp{gfxterm} for terminal output.
>>> address@hidden deffn
>>
>> There is a confusion between the background behind the letters
>> (background_color_normal/_highlight variables) and solid color used as
>> background image (background_color command). This description would
>> probably suggest former rather than the latter.
>>
>
> I'm afraid this exceeds my language skills. This is called background
> color for what I know. Any native English speaker to chime in?
>
I don't think it's about skills. It doesn't seem to be a clear term to
distinguish the both usages. I think a sentence explaining which colour
is meant is the best way to deal with the situation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Command documentation part 1.,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=