|
From: | Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: | Re: 2.02~beta3 release |
Date: | Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:16:41 +0100 |
28.02.2016 19:40, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> You forgot to tag GIT. I think we discussed that release tag should be
> signed, not sure if this is achievable.
Oh, sorry, was confused that tag name pattern is different from beta2.
We should pick one rule and stick to it (I do not really care which).
>
> 28.02.2016 17:21, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>> Hello, all. I've just released 2.02~beta3. The goal of this release is
>> to chase bugs so that we can move to 2.02 release. So from now on if you
>> think that your patch should be included in 2.02 rather than in 2.03,
>> please add [2.02] to the beginning of your email subject
>>
>> The tarball is available at
>> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz
>> and signature at
>> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz.sig
>>
>> Signed with following fingerprint:
>> E53D 497F 3FA4 2AD8 C9B4 D1E8 35A9 3B74 E82E 4209
>>
>> It's also available as a signed tag grub-2.02-beta3 in official git
>> repository.
>>
>> If you don't have xz support alternatively you may consider files
>> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz
>> and signature at
>> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz.sig
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Grub-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>>
>
>
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |