[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4
From: |
Theodore Ts'o |
Subject: |
Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:53:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
+grub-devel
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Felipe A Rodriguez wrote:
> Upgrading from e2fsprogs-1.42.13 to e2fsprogs-1.43.4 causes the boot
> loader to fail (unknown filesystem error) on the x86_64 VM I use for
> initial testing. I traced the problem to changes in the e2fsprogs
> configuration file which now sets 64 bit flags. I tried upgrading
> to GRUB 2.02 but that did not resolve the problem. Reverting the
> changes per the patch below fixes the problem.
Hmm, my laptop has been using a file system with the 64-bit feature
enabled for quite some time, and my Debian Stretch system has been
using Grub 2.02 to boot my system without any difficulties.
I've done a quick check of the Debian patches and none of them seem to
modify Grub's ext2/ext4 file system implementation. So I don't know
what to tell you. Are you sure you properly reinstalled grub on the
boot device after you upgraded to grub 2.02?
Cheers,
- Ted
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4,
Theodore Ts'o <=
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4, Christian Hesse, 2017/06/23
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4, Felipe A Rodriguez, 2017/06/24
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2017/06/24
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 [RESOLVED], Felipe A Rodriguez, 2017/06/25
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 [RESOLVED], Theodore Ts'o, 2017/06/25
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 [RESOLVED], Felipe A Rodriguez, 2017/06/26
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 [RESOLVED], Colin Watson, 2017/06/26
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 [RESOLVED], Theodore Ts'o, 2017/06/26
- Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 [RESOLVED], Felipe A Rodriguez, 2017/06/27