[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests: Switch to requiring exfatprogs from exfat-utils
|
From: |
Daniel Kiper |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests: Switch to requiring exfatprogs from exfat-utils |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:37:58 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 11:42:43PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> The current Debian stable, now 12, has dropped the exfat-utils package
> that the exfat filesystem test requires to run. There is an exfatprogs
> package that replaces exfat-utils, though it is not a drop-in replacement
> because mkfs.exfat has differing command line option names. Note, that
> we're not yet switching to using the exfat kernel module because this
> allows the testings on kernels that do not have the module.
>
> Update mkfs.exfat usage to adhere to the different exfatprogs usage. Also,
> the exfatprogs mkfs.exfat, following the exfat specification more closely,
> only allows a maximum of 22 bytes of UTF-16 characters in the volume label
> compared to 30 bytes from exfat-utils. So the exfat label test is updated
> accordingly.
>
> Update documentation to not that exfatprogs is now needed and also
s/to not/to note/?
> exfat-fuse, which is needed do the fuse mount.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Washburn <development@efficientek.com>
Otherwise Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>...
Daniel