Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

guile-devel (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Aug 31 2002 16:25:07 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• August 31, 2002
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Rob Browning, 16:25
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Neil Jerram, 15:04
  • Re: More on module API, Dale P. Smith, 14:32
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., tomas, 12:31
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Rob Browning, 12:04
  • Re: module trickery, Marius Vollmer, 11:01
  • Re: Emacs variables (was: Bug in eval-string?), Marius Vollmer, 09:51
  • Re: More on module API, Marius Vollmer, 09:49
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 08:01
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Neil Jerram, 04:30
• August 30, 2002
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Rob Browning, 23:10
  • Re: module trickery, Rob Browning, 22:58
  • Re: module trickery, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 19:00
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Wolfgang Jährling, 17:03
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Rob Browning, 16:36
  • Re: gcc optimisation breaks guile floating point, Gary Houston, 13:51
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., tomas, 09:03
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Martin Grabmueller, 05:13
• August 29, 2002
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Wolfgang Jährling, 17:00
  • Re: module trickery, Marius Vollmer, 16:40
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 15:58
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Lynn Winebarger, 15:28
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Lynn Winebarger, 15:21
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 14:55
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 14:49
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Lynn Winebarger, 14:08
  • Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Rob Browning, 13:57
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 13:49
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., tomas, 13:28
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., tomas, 13:04
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 12:24
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 12:22
  • 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc, Wolfgang Jährling, 09:38
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., tomas, 06:16
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Martin Grabmueller, 05:21
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Lars J. Aas, 03:59
• August 28, 2002
  • module trickery, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 19:26
  • lazy initialization, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 19:14
  • Re: gcc optimisation breaks guile floating point, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 18:50
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 18:40
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Sven Hartrumpf, 17:09
  • Re: gcc optimisation breaks guile floating point, Marius Vollmer, 16:31
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 14:15
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 12:29
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Lynn Winebarger, 12:25
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 11:34
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Sven Hartrumpf, 10:38
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 10:21
  • Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Sven Hartrumpf, 09:34
• August 27, 2002
  • gcc optimisation breaks guile floating point, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 18:27
  • gcc optimisation breaks guile floating point, Gary Houston, 17:10
  • Re: ARGH version.texi, Lynn Winebarger, 11:46
  • Re: ARGH version.texi, Rob Browning, 11:39
  • Emacs variables (was: Bug in eval-string?), Matthias Koeppe, 10:18
  • Re: Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Lars J. Aas, 05:06
  • Re: ARGH version.texi, Lynn Winebarger, 00:51
• August 26, 2002
  • Re: more syntax silliness, Lynn Winebarger, 18:34
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Marius Vollmer, 18:11
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 18:06
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 18:04
  • Re: scm_must_free, Marius Vollmer, 18:03
  • Re: ARGH version.texi, Neil Jerram, 17:58
  • Re: ARGH version.texi, Marius Vollmer, 17:58
  • Re: more syntax silliness, Marius Vollmer, 17:53
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 17:52
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 17:50
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 17:47
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Dale P. Smith, 14:16
  • Guile 1.5.8 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 13:34
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Martin Grabmueller, 13:26
• August 25, 2002
  • Re: SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Lynn Winebarger, 12:05
  • Re: SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Lars J. Aas, 09:28
• August 24, 2002
  • Re: SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Lynn Winebarger, 12:01
  • continuation benchmark patch, Lynn Winebarger, 11:29
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dirk Herrmann, 04:08
  • Re: SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Dirk Herrmann, 03:42
  • Re: more syntax silliness, Lynn Winebarger, 00:57
• August 23, 2002
  • Re: gc-stats cells-allocated negative, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 07:46
  • Re: gc-stats cells-allocated negative, Bill Schottstaedt, 07:40
  • Re: SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Lars J. Aas, 06:41
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Neil Jerram, 02:54
• August 22, 2002
  • ARGH version.texi, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 20:17
  • Re: SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Lars J. Aas, 09:47
  • SCM_POSFIXABLE(-1) fails with MSVC++ 6.0, Lars J. Aas, 09:30
• August 21, 2002
  • backport of GC mtrigger fix, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 20:21
  • scm_must_free, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 20:04
  • gc-stats cells-allocated negative, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 18:40
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 15:35
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 15:26
• August 20, 2002
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 16:51
  • Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 16:30
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 15:54
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Marius Vollmer, 15:16
  • Re: Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 14:38
  • Guile 1.5.7 beta available for testing., Rob Browning, 14:20
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 07:48
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Matthias Koeppe, 07:40
• August 19, 2002
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 19:29
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 14:52
  • more syntax silliness, Lynn Winebarger, 11:59
  • Re: syntax-case, Lynn Winebarger, 11:25
  • syntax-case, Lynn Winebarger, 11:01
  • Re: proposal: meaningful read error messages, Dirk Herrmann, 02:50
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 02:13
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Neil Jerram, 02:13
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 02:13
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Neil Jerram, 02:13
• August 18, 2002
  • After these several unsuccessful attempts, I decided to track his last name over the Internet, to locate any member of his family henceI contacted you., Mr.Nicolas Chuka. , 01:30
• August 17, 2002
  • Re: new GC code merged, Lynn Winebarger, 21:35
  • Re: new GC code merged, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 20:33
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dale P. Smith, 18:50
  • Re: Segfaults when using readline ..., Mikael Djurfeldt, 05:50
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dirk Herrmann, 04:09
  • Re: new GC code merged, Lynn Winebarger, 01:34
• August 16, 2002
  • Re: More on module API, Dale P. Smith, 22:05
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 20:21
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 18:03
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 18:02
• August 15, 2002
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 16:12
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 16:02
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 15:50
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 15:43
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 13:14
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 12:36
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 12:34
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 10:44
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 10:38
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 06:40
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 05:39
  • Segfaults when using readline ..., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 04:30
  • Segfaults when using readline ..., rm, 04:06
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Lynn Winebarger, 04:05
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 03:54
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 02:29
• August 14, 2002
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 22:43
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 17:45
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 17:31
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 17:09
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 16:54
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 16:48
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 16:16
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Dirk Herrmann, 15:37
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 15:35
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 15:07
  • Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 03:54
• August 13, 2002
  • Re: Questions about embedding Guile, Jesse Marlin, 18:31
  • Re: Questions about embedding Guile, Marius Vollmer, 17:17
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 16:55
  • Questions about embedding Guile, Jesse Marlin, 16:38
  • Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 16:06
  • gc-stats cells-allocated negative, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 09:19
  • gc-stats cells-allocated negative, Bill Schottstaedt, 09:04
• August 12, 2002
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 20:40
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 20:39
  • More on module API, rm, 15:17
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Matthias Koeppe, 14:20
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, rm, 06:37
• August 11, 2002
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 19:20
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 11:57
• August 10, 2002
  • Re: global vars, Rob Browning, 11:59
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 10:44
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 10:43
  • global vars, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 10:36
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 10:18
  • Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 10:16
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 09:33
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 09:30
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 09:09
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Marius Vollmer, 09:01
  • Re: C API for goops, Andreas Rottmann, 07:36
• August 09, 2002
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 11:24
  • Re: C API for goops, Mikael Djurfeldt, 09:34
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 09:11
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Matthias Koeppe, 07:29
  • Re: C API for goops, rm, 07:07
  • C API for goops, Mikael Djurfeldt, 06:56
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Matthias Koeppe, 06:24
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 05:48
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, rm, 05:23
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 05:19
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Matthias Koeppe, 05:06
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Matthias Koeppe, 04:47
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 04:03
• August 08, 2002
  • Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 19:23
  • Re: Value history, Marius Vollmer, 19:14
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 19:13
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 19:04
  • Re: When will modues use the new environemnts?, Dale P. Smith, 17:42
  • Re: Value history, Neil Jerram, 17:37
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 17:33
  • Re: When will modues use the new environemnts?, Neil Jerram, 17:32
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Neil Jerram, 17:32
  • Re: When will modues use the new environemnts?, Marius Vollmer, 17:16
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 17:14
  • Re: Bug in eval-string?, Marius Vollmer, 17:03
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 16:51
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 16:32
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 16:31
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 16:26
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 15:33
  • Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 15:32
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 14:12
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dale P. Smith, 14:01
  • Re: read errors, Marius Vollmer, 13:51
  • Re: Value history, Marius Vollmer, 13:47
  • Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 13:34
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 12:08
  • When will modues use the new environemnts?, Dale P. Smith, 10:49
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Rob Browning, 10:31
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dale P. Smith, 10:25
  • Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dale P. Smith, 10:23
  • What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 09:36
  • Bug in eval-string?, rm, 08:44
• August 07, 2002
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Dirk Herrmann, 16:55
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Dirk Herrmann, 16:51
• August 06, 2002
  • Re: read errors, Marius Vollmer, 08:03
• August 05, 2002
  • Re: read errors, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 19:12
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Michael Tuexen, 18:03
  • Re: Docs missing?, rm, 15:08
  • Re: Docs missing?, Neil Jerram, 15:03
  • Re: Possibly unclear documentation, Marius Vollmer, 14:53
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Rob Browning, 14:45
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Neil Jerram, 14:41
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Rob Browning, 14:31
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Rob Browning, 14:23
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, rm, 14:21
  • Re: scm_gc_calloc?, Marius Vollmer, 14:19
  • Re: new GC code merged, Marius Vollmer, 14:18
  • Re: read errors, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 14:16
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Marius Vollmer, 14:15
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 14:12
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Marius Vollmer, 14:11
  • Re: read errors, Marius Vollmer, 14:02
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Marius Vollmer, 13:51
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Marius Vollmer, 12:49
  • Docs missing?, rm, 12:39
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Michael Tuexen, 12:38
  • Re: Autoconf-like #defines in distributed header file, Rob Browning, 12:30
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, rm, 11:55
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Rob Browning, 11:53
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Marius Vollmer, 11:13
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Marius Vollmer, 11:08
  • Re: [PATCH] lambda* fails with #:key and rest argument (fwd), Marius Vollmer, 10:44
  • Autoconf-like #defines in distributed header file, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 07:54
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Michael Tuexen, 03:45
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Rob Browning, 01:24
• August 04, 2002
  • Value history, Greg Hewgill, 23:13
  • read errors, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 19:18
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 17:12
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Bruce Korb, 16:41
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Michael Tuexen, 15:00
  • Re: scm_gc_calloc?, Rob Browning, 14:38
  • Re: (no subject), Rob Browning, 14:38
  • Re: Guile on Mac OS X, Rob Browning, 14:21
  • (no subject), Han-Wen, 12:30
  • scm_gc_calloc?, Han-Wen, 11:34
  • port initialization?, Han-Wen, 10:39
  • GC success report, Han-Wen, 10:03
  • Guile on Mac OS X, Michael Tuexen, 08:34
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 00:03
• August 03, 2002
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 23:57
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 23:51
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 23:51
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 23:49
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 23:43
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 23:36
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 23:02
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 22:51
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 22:48
  • Re: i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 22:40
  • i know -- let's play bridge!, Tom Lord, 22:21
  • for example, Tom Lord, 22:13
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Tom Lord, 22:05
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Tom Lord, 22:01
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Han-Wen, 22:00
  • valgrind, Han-Wen, 21:53
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Dirk Herrmann, 21:51
  • new GC code merged, Han-Wen, 20:24
  • scm_register_collectable_memory() ?, Han-Wen, 14:17
  • status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Han-Wen, 08:09
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 03:27
• August 02, 2002
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Han-Wen, 19:44
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Dale P. Smith, 19:22
  • Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Rob Browning, 19:15
  • status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution, Dirk Herrmann, 18:42
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 15:50
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Bruce Korb, 14:10
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 13:50
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 11:00
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 10:50
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 10:36
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 07:47
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 05:24
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 02:10
• August 01, 2002
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 18:40
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 18:21
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Marius Vollmer, 16:10
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Marius Vollmer, 16:08
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 15:39
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 13:24
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Lynn Winebarger, 13:18
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 13:16
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Mr. Peter Ivanyi, 13:10
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, Rob Browning, 12:51
  • Re: SCM_PTR_LE ?, Marius Vollmer, 12:41
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 12:33
  • Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 12:27
  • Re: GC rewrite, first version., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 05:59
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, rm, 05:59
  • Re: GC rewrite, first version., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 05:58
  • Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question, rm, 05:30
  • Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 05:09
  • Re: GC rewrite, first version., Marius Vollmer, 04:46

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc