Re: module trickery

[Marius Vollmer]

address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:

> As it happens, I had asked a while ago if there was a version of
> define-syntax that did an export the way define-public does.

Hmm, should be a simple matter of

  (define-macro (define-syntax-public id . rest)
    `(begin 
      (define-syntax ,id ,@rest)
      (export ,id)))

Does that work?
 
> You also posted a patch for syncase that should work for unexported
> macros; will that be in 1.6?

No, I'm afraid not.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405