Re: Threads and asyncs

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:

> And, again, I'm talking a little bit pie-in-the-sky.  Should Guile
> never undertake to change its core away from (for example)
> conservative GC, if it converges on a nice API, then it is simply an
> implementation optimized for that particular API.  #f/() is the only
> irreconcilable issue I know of in this regard.  (Please, tb, spare us
> a rehearsal of jimb's design -- we all either agree with me, know i'm
> wrong, or already know the arguments.  Ok, now, please say something
> argumentive *anyway*.)

What "reconciliation" is needed?  

Who does guile have to reconcile with?