Re: new-model.text, please comment

[Lynn Winebarger]

On Friday 13 September 2002 17:06, Rob Browning wrote:
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > High level thought -- is all of this new thinking necessary?  Are we
> > unnecessarily ignoring useful stuff that has already been worked
> > through on other projects?
> 
> Well there's a very interesting thread on comp.lang.scheme we should
> also investigate as part of this process.  My newsgroup access is dead
> at the moment, but it was a *large* thread regarding macros and
> compilation.  One impression from skimming it was that the PLT people
> (I think it was PLT) feel like they've actually worked this out, and
> that they thought that most of the other implementations/solutions
> weren't addressing all the complexities yet.  Sorry, but that's about
> as good an impression as I can give until I have time to more
> thoroughly investigate.
> 

http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/publications/macromod.pdf
seems to be the relevant paper (it's not about units).  I haven't read it
yet, though.

Lynn