|
From: | Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: | Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep |
Date: | Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:57:29 -0300 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) |
Kevin Ryde escreveu: > (This got me wondering why there's a port table anyway, instead of > independent objects with say a weak hash table for the "list of all > ports" needed by port-for-each and flush-all. Historical reasons I > suppose.) I'm hacking at a patch to junk the table for a weak hash right now. Stay tuned. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |