[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: further hacking on guile-vm
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: further hacking on guile-vm |
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2008 03:52:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> So, I have been poking more at guile-vm. The focus of this patchset is
> on repl usability.
Looks cool!
I pulled from your branch and stumbled upon commit
7d1c45d38e34659c1ec3b76ba4c985901123bf61 entitled "fix macro compilation
via hooking into eval-case", which will probably lead to discussions.
;-)
I wanted to try a few things to refresh my memory on that topic, but it
appears that `pprint-glil' is currently broken:
guile> (use-modules (system il compile) (language scheme translate))
guile> (define hi (translate '(use-modules (srfi srfi-9)) (make-module)))
guile> (define lo (compile hi (make-module)))
guile> (use-modules (system il glil))
guile> (pprint-glil lo)
Backtrace:
In current input:
6: 0* [pprint-glil #<<glil-asm> vars: # body: #>]
In ../module/system/il/glil.scm:
195: 1 (let* ((port (if # # ...))) ((letrec (#) print) (unparse glil) 0)
...)
196: 2* [print ...
196: 3* [unparse #<<glil-asm> vars: # body: #>]
163: 4 (record-case glil ((<glil-asm> vars body) (quasiquote (@asm # #)))
...)
...
166: 5 (quasiquote (@asm (# # # #) (unquote-splicing #)))
168: 6* [map #<procedure unparse (glil)> (# # # # ...)]
In unknown file:
?: 7* [unparse #<<glil-source> loc: {#f}>]
In ../module/system/il/glil.scm:
163: 8* (let* ((#{\ g28}# glil)) (cond (# #) (# #) (# #) ...))
In unknown file:
?: 9 (cond ((# #{\ g28}#) (let # #)) ((# #{\ g28}#) (let # #)) ...)
In ../module/system/il/glil.scm:
...
171: 10 (quasiquote (@source (unquote (car loc)) (unquote (cdr loc))))
171: 11* [cdr {#f}]
../module/system/il/glil.scm:171:48: In procedure cdr in expression (cdr loc):
../module/system/il/glil.scm:171:48: Wrong type (expecting pair): #f
ABORT: (wrong-type-arg)
Any idea?
Surely you can achieve similar results more quickly using the REPL?
Thanks,
Ludovic.