Re: postpone discussion.

[Andy Wingo]

On Sun 15 Aug 2010 06:26, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:

> Probably for some interesting applications there will be a hughe
> demand on memory. And Keeping the redo tree slim can have a great cost
> benefit. I believe it is possible to save like 4x in space. And
> certaily 2x if guile was on a 32bit. Now it might be interesting to
> have guile in 64bit, but let guile sit on a 32 bit adress
> subspace. And only let the redo tree take advantage of adressing more
> then 32bits. This would logically save 2x of memory space. So is it
> possible to accomplish this?

Well, if you want a 32-bit address space... just compile a 32-bit
version, right?

> Hope this was stimulating.

It was interesting. I did not understand it all but am happy to listen
:)

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/