Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

guile-devel (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu May 31 2012 17:27:42 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• May 31, 2012
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Mark H Weaver, 17:27
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, David Kastrup, 10:49
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 10:05
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, David Kastrup, 01:09
• May 30, 2012
  • Re: assembler in scheme, Noah Lavine, 22:19
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Mike Gran, 19:48
  • %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 19:04
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 08:54
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 03:22
• May 29, 2012
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 09:54
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 08:19
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 04:50
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 02:37
• May 28, 2012
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 18:29
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 04:09
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 03:02
• May 27, 2012
  • The future of guile-log, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 16:31
  • Re: Error in wip-rtl, Noah Lavine, 13:18
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Andreas Rottmann, 12:43
• May 26, 2012
  • Re: assembler in scheme, Nala Ginrut, 22:58
  • assembler in scheme, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 14:34
  • Re: Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Hans Aberg, 08:58
  • Re: Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Ludovic Courtès, 08:45
• May 25, 2012
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 13:01
  • Re: Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Hans Aberg, 12:32
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 11:51
  • Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Ludovic Courtès, 11:31
  • Removing ‘GC_PTR’, Ludovic Courtès, 10:56
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Andy Wingo, 08:48
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 04:52
• May 24, 2012
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 08:58
• May 23, 2012
  • Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-158-g15bb587, Ludovic Courtès, 08:43
  • Re: Error in wip-rtl, Andy Wingo, 03:11
• May 22, 2012
  • Re: syntax parse link, Alex Shinn, 22:28
  • Error in wip-rtl, Noah Lavine, 22:04
  • Re: patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 15:13
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Ken Raeburn, 12:54
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Ken Raeburn, 12:51
  • Re: syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 12:41
  • Re: syntax parse link, Ludovic Courtès, 12:21
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Andy Wingo, 04:21
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Andy Wingo, 04:17
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Andy Wingo, 03:54
• May 21, 2012
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 05:33
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Andy Wingo, 04:59
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Andy Wingo, 04:26
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Neil Jerram, 02:41
  • a few proposed patches, Ken Raeburn, 01:46
• May 20, 2012
  • Re: syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 16:26
• May 19, 2012
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Neil Jerram, 17:55
• May 18, 2012
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 18:05
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 17:58
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Daniel Krueger, 16:14
• May 17, 2012
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 10:18
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Andy Wingo, 09:25
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 08:47
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Andy Wingo, 04:21
• May 16, 2012
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Nala Ginrut, 22:23
  • bug in syntax-case in master, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 17:34
  • problems evaluating code depending on version, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 17:32
  • Re: syntax parse link, Ludovic Courtès, 17:13
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Ludovic Courtès, 17:01
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Ludovic Courtès, 16:39
  • Re: syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 16:14
  • Re: stack closures for guile-log, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 16:12
  • bug in syntax-case in master, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 14:57
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Noah Lavine, 14:23
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Andy Wingo, 13:02
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 12:39
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Mark H Weaver, 12:28
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 11:05
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 11:02
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 10:58
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Noah Lavine, 10:54
  • Re: Register VM WIP, David Kastrup, 10:01
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Mark H Weaver, 09:45
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 03:15
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 03:10
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Mark H Weaver, 01:19
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Mark H Weaver, 00:24
• May 15, 2012
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Nala Ginrut, 21:56
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Noah Lavine, 20:39
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 20:20
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Mark H Weaver, 18:38
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 17:26
  • Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach, Ludovic Courtès, 17:23
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Andy Wingo, 16:49
  • Re: patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming, Andy Wingo, 16:39
  • Re: stack closures for guile-log, Andy Wingo, 16:37
  • Re: syntax parse link, Andy Wingo, 16:34
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Andy Wingo, 16:25
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Andy Wingo, 16:24
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Andy Wingo, 16:19
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Andy Wingo, 16:14
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Neil Jerram, 15:43
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Andy Wingo, 15:19
  • Re: GOOPs, MOP and slots, Andy Wingo, 15:08
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 14:49
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 14:46
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Andy Wingo, 14:44
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Andy Wingo, 14:41
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Andy Wingo, 14:38
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Andy Wingo, 14:37
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Ludovic Courtès, 13:13
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Mark H Weaver, 11:48
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 11:10
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Ludovic Courtès, 08:32
• May 14, 2012
  • Fwd: Making every goops object applicable, Krister Svanlund, 20:46
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Mark H Weaver, 18:32
  • Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach, Mark H Weaver, 18:26
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Mark H Weaver, 18:17
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Mark H Weaver, 18:05
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Andrew Gwozdziewycz, 17:28
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, dsmich, 17:26
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Ludovic Courtès, 17:09
  • terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 15:54
  • how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 15:13
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 13:30
  • Making every goops object applicable, Krister Svanlund, 13:24
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 12:59
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 11:14
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 11:00
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, David Kastrup, 10:12
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Sunjoong Lee, 10:08
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 10:05
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 09:59
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, David Kastrup, 09:00
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 08:47
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Ludovic Courtès, 08:44
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 06:52
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 04:03
• May 13, 2012
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 20:17
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Sunjoong Lee, 17:25
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Mark H Weaver, 14:30
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 11:08
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 11:04
• May 12, 2012
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 16:57
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Noah Lavine, 13:30
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 10:41
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nelson H. F. Beebe, 10:37
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 08:35
  • [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 08:30
• May 11, 2012
  • Re: Wish List, Ian Price, 16:35
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 16:29
  • Wish List, Sjoerd van Leent, 15:16
  • Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 12:20
  • GOOPs, MOP and slots, David Spångberg, 08:21
  • SRFI 64 and SRFI 78, Sunjoong Lee, 01:45
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Sunjoong Lee, 01:45
• May 10, 2012
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Sjoerd van Leent, 15:52
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Sjoerd van Leent, 15:31
• May 09, 2012
  • patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 12:07
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Noah Lavine, 08:06
• May 08, 2012
  • stack closures for guile-log, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 15:16
  • syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 11:46
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Ludovic Courtès, 10:45
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Ludovic Courtès, 10:41
  • Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Ludovic Courtès, 10:24
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 02:26
• May 07, 2012
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Daniel Hartwig, 23:27
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 22:27
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 20:34
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Alex Shinn, 18:06
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Andreas Rottmann, 16:11
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Noah Lavine, 14:26
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Mark H Weaver, 13:45
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Mark H Weaver, 13:37
  • Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach, Ludovic Courtès, 12:35
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Ludovic Courtès, 12:32
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Ludovic Courtès, 12:27
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Ludovic Courtès, 10:38
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 10:31
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 08:30
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Noah Lavine, 07:58
• May 06, 2012
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 15:48
  • Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Mark H Weaver, 14:18
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 12:53
  • Re: Performance tracking, dsmich, 06:38
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 06:14
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, David Kastrup, 06:12
  • Re: Performance tracking, Ludovic Courtès, 06:01
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Daniel Krueger, 05:34
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 00:52
• May 05, 2012
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Alex Shinn, 23:47
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Mark H Weaver, 23:36
  • Re: Performance tracking, dsmich, 21:43
  • Re: Performance tracking, Ludovic Courtès, 17:07
  • Re: Performance tracking, David Kastrup, 12:56
  • Re: Performance tracking, Noah Lavine, 12:51
  • Re: Performance tracking, David Kastrup, 12:45
  • Re: Performance tracking, Noah Lavine, 12:33
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Alex Shinn, 01:09
• May 04, 2012
  • Performance tracking, Ludovic Courtès, 19:31
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Neil Jerram, 17:43
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Andrew Gwozdziewycz, 09:17
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Nala Ginrut, 05:16
  • Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Nala Ginrut, 04:25
• May 03, 2012
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Nala Ginrut, 23:18
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Noah Lavine, 22:58
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 18:07
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Ludovic Courtès, 15:47
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Andy Wingo, 08:28
• May 02, 2012
  • [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 23:21
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Noah Lavine, 18:04
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Ludovic Courtès, 18:00
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Ludovic Courtès, 17:54
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Ludovic Courtès, 17:24
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Ludovic Courtès, 17:15
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 11:26
• May 01, 2012
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Noah Lavine, 23:33
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, dsmich, 19:57
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 19:26
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 19:22
  • Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 18:26
  • Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Noah Lavine, 17:15
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Nala Ginrut, 13:00
  • Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Mark H Weaver, 10:11

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc