[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ice-9 sandbox) vs. (ice-9 safe)
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
(ice-9 sandbox) vs. (ice-9 safe) |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 16:28:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 |
Hi,
Guile 2.2 has a (ice-9 sandbox) module, documented at
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-2.2/guile-ref/Sandboxed-Evaluation.html#index-make_002dsandbox_002dmodule
Earlier Guile already had the (ice-9 safe) module, which
provided a somewhat similar facility (which is also richer,
as it allows imposing time and memory limits on execution).
LilyPond currently uses (ice-9 safe) to implement its -dsafe mode.
Is it deprecated? Should we move to (ice-9 sandbox)? Is there anything
particular to be aware of in that transition that explains why (ice-9 safe)
remains around?
Thanks,
Jean
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- (ice-9 sandbox) vs. (ice-9 safe),
Jean Abou Samra <=