RE: [PATCH 1/3] Make string-length documentation more correct

[Andrew Tropin]

On 2024-06-26 14:26, Maxime Devos wrote:

>>No; he wrote é, U+0065 LATIN SMALL LETTER E + U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT,
>>which is two characters unlike é, LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE.
>>
>>Likewise 👨‍🏭 is U+1F468 MAN + U+200D ZERO WIDTH JOINER + U+1F3ED FACTORY.
>
> Right, I should have tested that instead of assuming it’s the
> pre-combined é and a single-codepoint emoji.
>

Let's keep string-length documentation intact :)

It would be cool if somebody apply the rest two patches.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrew Tropin

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature