|
From: | Whitlock, Bradley D |
Subject: | Guile 1.8 Garbage Collection Question |
Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:34:23 +0000 |
I have built Guile 1.8.8.2 on MinGW. I have wrapped some gtkwave code with Guile and have a memory issue. The following code apparently never frees ‘s’, but I am not sure why.
SCM_DEFINE (libguile_fst_writer_emit_value, "libguile-fst-writer-emit-value", 3,0,0, (SCM scm_ctx, SCM scm_fsthandle, SCM scm_val),
"Write a change on fstHandle") { // Storage for temporary string char* s = NULL; scm_dynwind_begin (0); scm_dynwind_unwind_handler (free, s, SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY); s = scm_to_locale_string (scm_val); fstWriterEmitValueChange(SCM_TO_CTX (scm_ctx), SCM_TO_FSTHANDLE (scm_fsthandle), s_buf); scm_dynwind_end(); return SCM_UNSPECIFIED; } The code is called from Scheme land in the following loop: (let loop ((n 0)) (if (eq? n 10000000) #t (begin ;; Emit some changes on the signal (fst-emit-value ctx s (number->string (modulo n 2))) (fst-emit-value ctx s1 (number->string (modulo (1+ n) 2))) (fst-emit-time-change ctx n) (loop (1+ n)) ))) It seems to me that the garbage collector never gets a chance to run, so how do I make sure that the gc gets a turn?
If I define my function like the following, the leak disappears, but it’s a less desirable solution: SCM_DEFINE (libguile_fst_writer_emit_value, "libguile-fst-writer-emit-value", 3,0,0, (SCM scm_ctx, SCM scm_fsthandle, SCM scm_val),
"Write a change on fstHandle") { // Storage for temporary string char s_buf [1024]; scm_to_locale_stringbuf (scm_val, s_buf, 1024); s = scm_to_locale_string (scm_val); fstWriterEmitValueChange(SCM_TO_CTX (scm_ctx), SCM_TO_FSTHANDLE (scm_fsthandle), s_buf); return SCM_UNSPECIFIED; } Any suggestion? Thanks, Brad |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |