[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Guix] FTBFS on Ubuntu (12.04) 64bit. Various fatal during install.
From: |
BlueT - Matthew Lien - 練喆明 |
Subject: |
Re: [Guix] FTBFS on Ubuntu (12.04) 64bit. Various fatal during install. |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jul 2013 01:12:16 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2013年07月08日 19:55, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "BlueT - Matthew Lien - 練喆明" <address@hidden> skribis:
>> checking for the Guix system type... x86_64-linux
>> ./configure: line 6755: syntax error near unexpected token `GUILE,'
>> ./configure: line 6755: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, guile-2.0 >= 2.0.5)'
>
> Yes, you need to have pkg.m4, as provided by pkg-config, in the
> ACLOCAL_PATH.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2013-06/msg00037.html
Yes I do have those packages and files installed.
address@hidden:~$ dpkg -la|grep -P "(pkg-config|autoconf|guile)"
ii autoconf 2.68-1ubuntu2
automatic configure script builder
ii guile-2.0 2.0.5+1-1 GNU
extension language and Scheme interpreter
ii guile-2.0-dev 2.0.5+1-1
Development files for Guile 2.0
ii guile-2.0-libs 2.0.5+1-1 Core
Guile libraries
ii pkg-config 0.26-1ubuntu1
manage compile and link flags for libraries
address@hidden:~$ dpkg -L pkg-config |grep pkg.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4
>> 2. guix-0.2
>> Test begin:
>> test-name: "package-field-location"
>> Test end:
>> result-kind: fail
>> actual-value: #f
>
> You’re using Guile 2.0.5, right?
address@hidden:~$ guile --version|head -n 1
guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.5-deb+1-1
> Can you try the patch below, run ‘make check’,
> and report the “;;; (name” and “;;; (version” lines from test-suite.log?
Hmmm there's no line with keyword 'version'.
address@hidden:~/guix-0.2$ grep -P "(name|ver)" test-suite.log
;;; (name #<<location> file: "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm" line: 188
column: 5>)
(log in attachment)
>> Test begin:
>> test-name: "filtered-port, file"
>> Test end:
>> result-kind: fail
>> actual-value: #f
>
> I believe this has been fixed:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2013-07/msg00031.html
Ok I'll test it once I can remove the blocker in Git version of Guix.
> Note that it’s safe to install Guix at this point. From there you’ll be
> able to just run ‘guix pull’ to upgrade to the latest Guix from ‘master’.
> Incidentally, you’ll be able to actually use it to install packages. :-)
I see.
But I'd be more comfortable to see a software passed all tests before
installing it. :-P
> Thanks for testing!
Love to help FLOSS projects. :-)
But I think I'm kinda annoying to you about these bug/issue reports.
I almost feel I'm dumb 'coz I can't do more debugging/bug-fixing with
scheme.
Best wishes,
BlueT
- --
/ Just another [ Perl | FOSS | Security ] Hacker. /
/ BlueT = Matthew Lien = 練喆明 /
/ http://BlueT.org /
/ GPG: 4A293CBD /
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlHa8uwACgkQvRNvgEopPL1KbACePYZ1Adztt+KwjA5wOlS1XsLF
ZBQAn28i2N4rEe0iI6uYvkBLYDIax3BK
=Uz2s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
utils.log
Description: Text Data
test-suite.log
Description: Text Data
packages.log
Description: Text Data
- Re: [Guix] FTBFS on Ubuntu (12.04) 64bit. Various fatal during install.,
BlueT - Matthew Lien - 練喆明 <=
- Re: [Guix] FTBFS on Ubuntu (12.04) 64bit. Various fatal during install., Ludovic Courtès, 2013/07/08
- FAQ, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/07/08
- Re: FAQ, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/07/09
- Re: FAQ, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/07/09
- Re: FAQ, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/07/09
- Re: FAQ, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/07/09
- Re: FAQ, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/07/09
- Re: FAQ, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/07/10
- Re: FAQ, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/07/10
- Re: FAQ, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/07/12