[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging. |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:11:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden> skribis:
> I’ve just fixed a small bug [1]. Maybe we should agree to run
>
> make distclean && ./boostrap && ./configure && make && make check
>
> before pushing, or will it be too tedious?
For this kind of error (unbound variable), just typing ‘make’ or C-c C-k
in Geiser reports the unbound variable.
Doing that before pushing is definitely advised.
Sometimes that’s not enough to detect other errors (such as circular
dependencies), but that’s quite unusual.
> Also, I don’t like the ‘license:’ prefix. What about something like
> ‘l:’? It’ll probably be even better to use ‘#:select’ when it’s
> possible.
Yes, I prefer #:select when possible, but otherwise either of these two
prefixes is fine with me.
Thanks,
Ludo’.