guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging.
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:11:36 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden> skribis:

> I’ve just fixed a small bug [1].  Maybe we should agree to run
>
> make distclean && ./boostrap && ./configure && make && make check
>
> before pushing, or will it be too tedious?

For this kind of error (unbound variable), just typing ‘make’ or C-c C-k
in Geiser reports the unbound variable.

Doing that before pushing is definitely advised.

Sometimes that’s not enough to detect other errors (such as circular
dependencies), but that’s quite unusual.

> Also, I don’t like the ‘license:’ prefix.  What about something like
> ‘l:’?  It’ll probably be even better to use ‘#:select’ when it’s
> possible.

Yes, I prefer #:select when possible, but otherwise either of these two
prefixes is fine with me.

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]