[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Packages with libraries and binaries
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Packages with libraries and binaries |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:06:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
When trying to use cdparanoia, I noticed the following:
$ ldd `which cdparanoia`
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff1e9dd000)
libcdda_interface.so.0 => not found
libcdda_paranoia.so.0 => not found
libm.so.6 =>
/nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/libm.so.6
(0x00007fb37355b000)
librt.so.1 =>
/nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/librt.so.1
(0x00007fb373353000)
libc.so.6 =>
/nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/libc.so.6
(0x00007fb372fa5000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007fb372d89000)
/nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
=> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb373877000)
The two missing libraries are part of the package itself; apparently, they
do not get encoded into the rpath. Could this be handled somehow by the build
system? Should it be done in the package definition? Or should I set an
LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
Andreas
- Packages with libraries and binaries,
Andreas Enge <=