Re: Gtk+ 3

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> So that means GTK+ 3 actually works, right?  That’s cool!
>
> This is a good question, since none of the packages I am interested in
> uses gtk+ so far. But I am working on packaging one ;-)
>
> I tried to use the slideshow binary from the racket package; it fails with
> ffi-lib: couldn't open "libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0" (libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot 
> open shared object file: No such file or directory)
>   context...:
> So it also requires gtk+-2; apparently an error in the configure script.
> I will also revert this back.

OK.

> xnee has only one binary, cnee, which fails for me with
> Error number:   6
>   Error:        Wrong paramters
>   Description:  You have given invalid input to Xnee 
>   Argument:     (NO ARG)
> At least, it does not look gtk+-related. On the other hand, "ldd cnee"
> does not show anything gtk+-related either, nor does "guix gc --references";
> so maybe the input gtk+ is not actually used at all?

I think Xnee has an optional gnee program (or something like that) that
provides a GTK+ GUI.  But maybe it explicitly checks for gtk+-2.0 and
just disables that when that is not found?

I’ll check if Geeqie works and report back.

Ludo’.