Re: ‘snippet’ in <origin>

[Mark H Weaver]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> More generally, I'm not fond of this inflexible hardcoded approach.  I'd
>> prefer to have a set of phases (e.g. unpack, patch, delete, repack) that
>> can be selectively overridden if needed, but with some specialized
>> constructors that make things simple in the common cases.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> The rationale for me is that <origin> should remain simple, while the
> package’s build system would handle anything non-trivial.  For that
> reason, and also because I knew it would avoid a full rebuild, I avoided
> full-blown phases.
>
> Now, I think we could replace ‘snippet’ by ‘phases’.  That field would
> contain an <origin-phases> object with exactly 4 fields: unpack, patch,
> user (default to #f), and repack.
>
> In the LAPACK case, we’d do:
>
>   (origin
>     (uri ...)
>     (sha256 ...)
>     (phases (origin-phases (inherit %standard-origin-phases)
>               (user '(for-each delete-file ...)))))
>
> I think that would address your problem.  The set of phases would be
> fixed, though, unlike what ‘gnu-build-system’ does, but I think that’s
> fine.
>
> How does that sound?

Sounds good to me!

> If that’s workable without triggering a full rebuild, I can look at it
> by 0.5.  Otherwise that’ll have to wait.

Indeed, let's not trigger a full rebuild :)

    Thanks,
      Mark