[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot
From: |
Sree Harsha Totakura |
Subject: |
Re: /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:16:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2014 08:56 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> We should not inherit /dev from the host system at all, but rather
> create it from scratch with just the things we need. IMO, that's
> the only truly proper solution.
We can try creating a fixed set of device nodes, for example:
/dev/null, /dev/random, /dev/urandom, /dev/sda etc. Has anyone tried
this before?
Sree
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlLiPZUACgkQO2+K8UPCHzvyuwCgpPH4ndRBqFkITqbPcQ1UN4Ws
JsYAniMrgj8mBvNMC7Jq1AkFv+bV/VUj
=DbCU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/01/23
- Re: /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Mark H Weaver, 2014/01/23
- Re: /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot,
Sree Harsha Totakura <=
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Shea Levy, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Mark H Weaver, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Shea Levy, 2014/01/24