[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot
From: |
Sree Harsha Totakura |
Subject: |
Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:44:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 |
On 01/24/2014 06:13 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Shea Levy <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Another option is to mount a devtmpfs there, for systems which support it.
devtmpfs may give different devices on each machine and they may hinder
our build reproducibility.
> The thing is, we don't actually want most of the system's devices to be
> in the build environment, do we? These are all impurities. I don't
> think we want /dev/sda, for example.
Sure, I agree. I propose we start enumerating commonly needed devices
and create them. If in future, a package requires access to certain
device while building (or during tests) we can include it in our list of
created device nodes.
Sree
- /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/01/23
- Re: /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Mark H Weaver, 2014/01/23
- Re: /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Shea Levy, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Mark H Weaver, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot,
Sree Harsha Totakura <=
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/01/24
- Re: [Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot, Shea Levy, 2014/01/24